The Commonwealth: A Legacy of Colonialism or a Necessary Global Partnership?

By Captain Perrygrino Nelson (Rtd.)

The Commonwealth of Nations is often portrayed as a voluntary association of 56 independent countries, many of which were once under British colonial rule. It is described as an intergovernmental organization aimed at fostering cooperation, trade, and cultural exchange among member states. However, as the world awakens to the realities of neocolonialism, I find myself questioning the true relevance and necessity of the Commonwealth in the modern era.

Origins and Functions of the Commonwealth

The Commonwealth was established in 1949, evolving from the British Empire. Today, it claims to promote democracy, human rights, and economic cooperation. The organization holds biennial meetings known as the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meetings (CHOGM), maintains the Commonwealth Secretariat, and organizes the Commonwealth Games. Additionally, it offers technical assistance and development programs for member states.

Despite these seemingly noble objectives, the Commonwealth remains deeply rooted in its colonial past. While it has evolved over time, its existence cannot be entirely separated from the legacy of imperialism.

A Symbol of Neocolonial Influence?

One of the pressing concerns regarding the Commonwealth is its role in perpetuating neocolonialism. Although membership is voluntary, the power dynamics within the organization are far from equal. The United Kingdom, as the former colonial power, continues to exert significant influence over economic policies and trade agreements. The continued presence of the British monarchy as the symbolic head of the Commonwealth reinforces the lingering effects of colonial rule.

In Africa, neocolonialism manifests in economic dependency, brain drain, and the prioritization of foreign interests over national development. Many Commonwealth nations still rely heavily on Western financial institutions, multinational corporations, and foreign aid, often at the expense of self-reliance and industrialization. The Commonwealth does little to challenge this status quo. Instead, it fosters an environment where former colonial powers maintain economic and political leverage over their erstwhile colonies.

The Case for Regional Cooperation Over the Commonwealth

Africa, in particular, does not need the Commonwealth to achieve economic growth and political stability. Regional organizations such as the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the African Union (AU), and the Southern African Development Community (SADC) are better suited to address the continent’s unique challenges. These institutions prioritize regional trade, infrastructure development, and conflict resolution without the historical baggage of colonialism.

Unlike the Commonwealth, which maintains ties based on former colonial relationships, African regional organizations are built on a shared vision of progress. They promote intra-continental trade, unity, and industrialization that serve African interests rather than those of foreign powers. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) is a testament to Africa’s capacity for self-reliance, demonstrating that economic growth does not have to be linked to former colonial ties.

The Commonwealth and Its Impact on Development

Proponents of the Commonwealth argue that it provides developmental aid and technical assistance to member states. However, the effectiveness of this assistance is questionable. Aid often comes with strings attached, reinforcing economic dependency rather than empowering nations to stand on their own. Moreover, Commonwealth trade agreements tend to favor more developed member states, particularly the UK, while African and Caribbean nations struggle with trade imbalances and restrictive policies.

The brain drain phenomenon further illustrates the limitations of the Commonwealth. Highly skilled professionals from Africa, the Caribbean, and the Pacific often migrate to Commonwealth countries such as the UK, Canada, and Australia, depriving their home nations of valuable expertise. This exodus of talent hampers development and perpetuates reliance on foreign expertise, creating a vicious cycle of underdevelopment.

A Call for Self-Reliance and True Independence

As I reflect on the significance of the Commonwealth, I am compelled to question its necessity in the modern world. If the goal is economic development, political stability, and technological advancement, then Africa and other former colonies must look inward rather than to an organization that is intrinsically linked to their colonial past.

Self-reliance and self-administration should be the guiding principles for post-colonial nations. This does not mean isolation but rather strategic partnerships based on mutual respect and shared interests rather than historical subjugation.

Conclusion

While the Commonwealth is marketed as a platform for global cooperation, its foundation remains deeply tied to the colonial legacy. Its structure, influence, and economic policies often serve to maintain neocolonial relationships rather than dismantle them.

The time has come for former colonies to reconsider their participation in such an organization. By strengthening regional cooperation, investing in homegrown industries, and prioritizing self-reliance, we can break free from the shadows of colonialism and chart a path toward true independence and sustainable development.

Africa, in particular, has the resources, talent, and potential to thrive without the Commonwealth. It is time to focus on fostering unity and economic self-determination through institutions that serve our collective interests rather than perpetuate foreign dominance.

What arguemment would i likley face from thos paper?